Quoting Richard Hirst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The obvious difference to me is that in base-installer, all the > Description names are Description-*.UTF-8, while in elilo-installer they > are all .ISO-8859-2, or EUC-JP, or whatever. Yes, this is the sign of a missing debian/po/output file I guess that elilo-installer on the system you tested was an older than 2 weeks version. This output file was added 2 weeks ago according to CVS (Wed Dec 24 08:50:33 2003 UTC) > > > I then built a new elilo-installer from head, and its templates file > uses UTF-8, so I conclude that we should build/upload a new > elilo-installer. So far as beta2 is concerned, I tried an install in > French, and all was well, except the one dialog from elilo was in > English. I guess we can live with that for now. Yes, your conclusion is right. 0.0.2 upload happend on Dec 15th The english dialog in beta2 for french installation is a direct consequence of the wrong encoding, thus logical. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
