On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:46:54PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:30:06PM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:25:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Joey Hess wrote: > > > > > +elif [ -d modules/$flavour ]; then > > > > > + modlistdir=modules/$flavour > > > > > > > > Looks like this would also allow the i386 xfs kernel to look like this > > > > in kernel-versions: > > > > > > > > i386 2.4.22 xfs ... > > > > > > > > And use the modules/i386-xfs directory. Steve? > > > > Er, no it won't. I suppose the flavor could be 386-xfs though. > > > Well, with i386 as the arch and xfs as the falvour, it'll use > > modules/i386-xfs, it's the line just above my own addition. > > The issue I've been having is getting the uname output of the > kernel-image packages to match what we need to see, so that package > names can be autodetected by the installer *and* we can simplify the use > of flavor names. > > Just needs a bit of attention, I'm sure.
Why not use archdetect for this ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
