Your message dated Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:18:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#227851: fixed in udpkg 0.020
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2004 09:14:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 15 03:14:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ah3a1-000591-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 03:14:22 -0600
Received: from thomas (bobillot-3-82-67-146-148.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.146.148])
by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F029FC332
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:14:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: by thomas (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0F4FC140EA; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:14:19 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:14:19 +0100
From: Thomas Poindessous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: udpkg: [PATCH] wrong architecture for sparc64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.37
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level:
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: udpkg
Severity: normal
Hi, udpkg --print-architecture reports sparc64 for UltraSparc; it needs
to report sparc instead.
here is a small patch which corrects that. It was tested.
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thomas 2.4.24-1-k7 #1 Wed Jan 7 00:47:47 EST 2004 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Thomas Poindessous
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="udpkg.diff"
Index: tools/udpkg/udpkg.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/tools/udpkg/udpkg.c,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -r1.45 udpkg.c
--- tools/udpkg/udpkg.c 13 Dec 2003 00:17:49 -0000 1.45
+++ tools/udpkg/udpkg.c 14 Jan 2004 23:54:02 -0000
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
{ "parisc64", "hppa" },
{ "ppc", "powerpc" },
{ "ppc64", "powerpc" },
+ { "sparc64", "sparc" },
};
if (uname(&name) < 0)
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 227851-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2004 18:19:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 24 10:19:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AkSNb-0005G7-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 10:19:35 -0800
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AkSMq-0000iH-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:18:48 -0500
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $
Subject: Bug#227851: fixed in udpkg 0.020
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:18:48 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24
X-Spam-Level:
Source: udpkg
Source-Version: 0.020
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
udpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
udpkg_0.020.dsc
to pool/main/u/udpkg/udpkg_0.020.dsc
udpkg_0.020.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/udpkg/udpkg_0.020.tar.gz
udpkg_0.020_i386.udeb
to pool/main/u/udpkg/udpkg_0.020_i386.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated udpkg package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 18:57:24 +0100
Source: udpkg
Binary: udpkg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.020
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
udpkg - Tiny dpkg clone (udeb)
Closes: 227851
Changes:
udpkg (0.020) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Petter Reinholdtsen
- Report arch 'sparc' instead of 'sparc64' on UltraSparc.
Patch from Thomas Poindessous. (Closes: #227851)
* Bastian Blank
- Remove runtime detection of debian architecture.
Files:
e15351bb9a5b1705ce1d2247a63174a2 647 debian-installer standard udpkg_0.020.dsc
fb012b13b2fd71f3884d6a1497d58f00 28313 debian-installer standard udpkg_0.020.tar.gz
571b561cd929b8d0dfaab6812b1cc929 7272 debian-installer standard udpkg_0.020_i386.udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkAStD0ACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGKjgCePLbNRxEEPA7+4I/RGiy3Xyes
L4AAn3eDnO39P2KtqowsBW6EG4t/dGz7
=OQLW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
