On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:48:42PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 06:35:21PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out why depmod, insmod, and modprobe are give the > > error that the sparc64 kernel modules are not for this architecture on > > my latest d-i boot cds. I'm using the ones in the modutils-full udeb, > > uname -m reports sparc64, and they match the kernel version. (The > > busybox version is known not to work for sparc64.) > > It wound up busybox was insisting on using it's internal versions > despite the corrent binaries being in /sbin. I'm rebuilding busybox > now with modutils disabled.
Is it for space reduction, that you disable modutils in busybox? I would simply include the normal modutils in the image. > > > I tried setting the enviornment UNAME_MACHINE to sparc64 and that > > didn't help. > > Further examination and experimentation showed the (undocumented?) > UNAME_MACHINE feature of modutils is broken as well. > > -- > Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Geert Stappers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
