Your message dated Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:02:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#223088: fixed in prebaseconfig 0.52
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2003 18:59:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 06 12:59:19 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from guadiana.unex.es [158.49.17.23] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AShOf-0001Cc-00; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 12:43:17 -0600
Received: from cantor.unex.es ([158.49.18.105])
        by guadiana.unex.es with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1AShOe-0005t7-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 19:43:16 +0100
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 19:42:08 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: prebaseconfig: should use binary-indep, not binary-arch
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
        2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_99,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: prebaseconfig
Version: 0.42
Tags: patch

The udeb produced by this source package is Architecture: all, so
it should be generated in the binary-indep target, not in binary-arch.

Patch follows:

diff -ru prebaseconfig-0.42.orig/debian/rules prebaseconfig-0.42/debian/rules
--- prebaseconfig-0.42.orig/debian/rules        Sat Oct 18 18:36:33 2003
+++ prebaseconfig-0.42/debian/rules     Sat Dec  6 19:40:00 2003
@@ -46,11 +46,11 @@
        done

 # Build architecture-independent files here.
-binary-indep: build install
+binary-arch: build install
 # We have nothing to do by default.

 # Build architecture-dependent files here.
-binary-arch: build install base-install
+binary-indep: build install base-install
 base-install:
        dh_testdir
        dh_testroot

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 223088-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Feb 2004 19:04:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 14 11:04:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1As55X-00043T-00; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 11:04:27 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1As53D-0000Zr-00; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:02:03 -0500
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $
Subject: Bug#223088: fixed in prebaseconfig 0.52
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:02:03 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: prebaseconfig
Source-Version: 0.52

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
prebaseconfig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

prebaseconfig_0.52.dsc
  to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.52.dsc
prebaseconfig_0.52.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.52.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_0.52_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.52_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated prebaseconfig package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:43:49 +0100
Source: prebaseconfig
Binary: prebaseconfig
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.52
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 prebaseconfig - Finish the installation and reboot (udeb)
Closes: 223088 230598
Changes: 
 prebaseconfig (0.52) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Updated Translations
     - Bart Cornelis
       - Added corrections send by Bastiaan Eeckhoudt (nl.po)
   * Petter Reinholdtsen
     - Show progress info when executing the prebaseconfig
       parts. (Closes: #230598)
     - Build udeb using the binary-indep, as this package is
       for all archs.  Patch from  Santiago Vila. (Closes: #223088)
Files: 
 29566d031655f02d0a69a88300323b07 707 debian-installer required prebaseconfig_0.52.dsc
 d735c9f2fd6298e49cd7bdb18d4ba68a 27092 debian-installer required 
prebaseconfig_0.52.tar.gz
 b5d8bfbfb652ab3b9457c5b574b3c254 13104 debian-installer required 
prebaseconfig_0.52_all.udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFALmzZ20zMSyow1ykRApzDAJ49nGhLx5BB/Yn1IwRKkw7qNmxzzwCgyj+T
P9t9T1K/ARCnwmfn/dyRnGc=
=hLpB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to