Your message dated Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:38:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230657: rootfs is not replaced correctly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2004 18:19:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 01 10:19:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg) [62.44.101.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AnMB0-00068Z-00; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:19:19 -0800
Received: from fmi.uni-sofia.bg ([62.44.101.57])
by smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg
for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:16:21 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:16:21 +0200
From: Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5a (Windows/20040120)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rootfs is not replaced correctly
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
I've installed Debian using 2004-01-30 build from
http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/i386/ . I used
partman and set swap partition and root partition. But later grub
couldn't install. The reason was that there was something like that in
/target/etc/fstab:
rootfs / ....
That is, rootfs is not replaced with name of root partition, although I
set in partman that /dev/hda6 should be root partition. After fixing
this, grub installed correctly.
That's all that I see as problem.
Regards,
ogi
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 231755-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 15:33:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 07:33:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lml.bas.bg [195.96.224.121]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzHKT-0003Tl-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 07:33:37 -0800
Received: from anton by lml.bas.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AzHPJ-0001Oy-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 17:38:37 +0200
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:38:37 +0200
From: Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#230657: rootfs is not replaced correctly
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
X-Spam-Level:
On 1.II.2004 at 20:16 Ognyan Kulev wrote:
>
> The reason was that there was something like that in
> /target/etc/fstab:
>
> rootfs / ....
Thanks for your bug-report. I belive that it was fixed in version 10
of partman.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
