On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:10:37AM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-12 10:04]: > > A lot of your problems sound like they stemmed from the wrong > > partition type for the partition you wanted to use as a physical > > volume, but then 83 is a short typo from 8e, so you may have had it > > right. > > Oh, I wrote 83... yes, that's a typo. It definitely was 8e/LVM (grrr, > just typed 83 again ;). > > > lvm2 isn't in the 2.4 series kernels is it?). > > Yes, it is. At least our Debian kernel has it. (It might be in > 2.4.25 upstream now, not sure; but we had it since 2.4.24 or so.)
Hmm, okay. I just read Joey's email with deadlines for udeb changes. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to retest an LVM install to see if I can reproduce your problems between now and then. If lvm10 and lvm2 will coexist (which I think they can) it might be worthwhile altering the postinst for lvmcfg to install both packages and getting it in for beta3. Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
