Dan Weber wrote: > The merge of module-init-tools with busybox would be a mess. First, > insmod, and rmmod appear to be 2.6 compliant from busybox cvs, but the > depmod code is not nearly the same as it was in modutils. I think we > should take joey's idea and make a module-init-tools-udeb. The > maintainer has no issue packaging it with the standard distribution so > this should go smoothly. Hmm. Would it be at all reasonable to use insmod and rmmod from busybox, and just build depmod, modprobe, etc. from module-init-tools? Or is that too messy to be worth considering?
-- Make sure your vote will count. http://www.verifiedvoting.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
