On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 06:38:58PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [ I've Cc'ed all maintainers of affected packages. ]
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:10:09AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 03:37:24AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >...
> > > It depends on the subarchitecture. In the installer, m68k-amiga uses
> > > 2.4.20, m68k-mac uses 2.2.25.
> >
> > m68k now has 2.4.25 and 2.2.25 and uses these in d-i. All the older
> > kernels can probably be removed, but I intended to wait until the
> > maintainer returns from vacation to ask.
> >
> > m68k needs to keep 2.2 kernels for now.
>
>
> Below is a list of kernel 2.2 packages (by source package) and packages
> (build-)depending on them.
[...]
> - kernel-image-2.2.25-mac
This one does. There is no 2.4 kernel yet that functions on all m68k
macs (and, most likely, there will never be one; but the 2.6 series
should support macs on a bright day)
> - kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-udeb
This one can go. In fact, a bug to drop it has already been filed...
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
