Your message dated Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:40:40 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240098: bad gateway suggestions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2004 19:11:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 25 11:11:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B6aGA-0001RV-00; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:11:22 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-93-147.access.naxs.com [216.98.93.147])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B5717E6B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:11:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5784D6E12D; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:10:13 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:10:13 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bad gateway suggestions
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.54
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: netcfg
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Version: 0.58
If I tell it to use a static IP address of 192.168.1.2, take the defalt
netmask of 255.255.255.0, it suggests that my gateway might be
193.168.1.0. This is a new problem, the calculations were always right
before..
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US
--=20
see shy jo
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAYy6Ud8HHehbQuO8RAq0rAJ4rN/6P5ItSocq+2L0XQKYziIC1BACgyTqb
JAtWyAh7GzeltXLsetnHBzk=
=mpY6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 240098-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2004 19:48:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 25 11:48:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B6aqZ-0005cQ-00; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:48:59 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-93-147.access.naxs.com [216.98.93.147])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662C2181C3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:48:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D41B56E12D; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:40:40 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:40:40 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#240098: bad gateway suggestions
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Fixed.
Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: netcfg
> Severity: normal
> Tags: d-i
> Version: 0.58
>=20
> If I tell it to use a static IP address of 192.168.1.2, take the defalt
> netmask of 255.255.255.0, it suggests that my gateway might be
> 193.168.1.0. This is a new problem, the calculations were always right
> before..
>=20
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
> Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US
>=20
> --=20
> see shy jo
--=20
see shy jo
--GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAYzW4d8HHehbQuO8RAnufAJ94H3IitLAsX89va6a1YlyVsjqLMgCfQHZw
vaZa2ZUVhOxLH4t53gXPCTQ=
=iJuc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
