Hi, I perfectly understand your reasoning, but frakly not quite the conlusion.
> We do not want a vast quantity of users with > "sarge" in their sources.list, who will then be left without security > updates and a trivial upgrade path when sarge+1 is released. Yes, that's me ;-) I'd like my machine to stick with sarge when it is released as stable and not following testing anymore after that. (which will be sarge+1) So I thought by specifying sarge now users will have the correct pointer now and then, without requirering manual change. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
