Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > > Bj�rn's page is broken. > > > > There is no automatic testing propigaton of udebs. Period. All > > propigation happens when someone tells me a good reason to put a udeb > > into testing, or when they are all copied from unstable as part of a > > release. > > Bj�rn, I like the service and insight your pages offer very much. but, could > you please "fix" your page, e.g. add a "disclaimer" ;-) and explain that > there are some packages which are treated differently than others regarding > moving from testing to unstable ?
Absolutely, as soon as I understand what the difference is. base-installer is listed in update_excuses.html as all other candidate packages: ====== base-installer (- to 0.066) - Maintainer: Debian Install System Team - 2 days old (needed 2 days) - base-installer has no binaries on any arch - base-installer (source) is buggy! (1 > 0) - Not considered ====== This is the input data my script uses, along with the Packages and Sources files. How can it tell that base-installer is being treated differently than other packages? Just adding a blanket disclaimer is not helpful, IMHO. -- Bj�rn
