On 5.IV.2004 at 14:21 Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > Each recipe is one file, so I could either a) overwrite the recipe > with my own or b) modify the file and add the boot partition at the > beginning.
I think that partman-auto should provide different recipes depending on the architecture. > particularly beautiful. I was wondering if it would be possible to > put each recipe into a directory which files for each partition, > i.e. something like: > > recipes/ > atomic/ > 003_root > 007_swap I think it is better to create completely new recipe when there is a need to. > Also, partman-auto hardcodes many things, for example: > perform_recipe: ext2|ext3|linux-swap|fat16|fat32) > recipes.sh: ext2|ext3|xfs|reiserfs|linux-swap|fat16|fat32) > Shouldn't this be gathered on the fly? These should list all file systems recognised by parted (not all file systems supported by partman and partman-auto). The first list has to be extended, but otherwise everything is OK. > Finally, I also looked at partman-palo... -palo is not considered in > -auto at all, so I guess people using automatic partitions on HPPA > will end up with a partition table that -palo will complain about. Right. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
