On 12.IV.2004 at 15:03 Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote: > The sentence below was found in partman-partitioning's pot. > "Hint: Use \"20%\" (or \"30%\", etc.) for 20% (resp. 30%, etc.) over the" > "minimum allowed size. Use \"max\" as a shortcut for the maximum allowed " > "size." > > To get 120% of the minimum size, you need to enter "20%". Am I right?
Yes. > If true, it will maybe confuse many users (especially, for those > non-native english speakers). At least, I need to think for a while > to get the real meaning. Probably, a more direct way (such as, using > "120%") should be better. How do you think? I can not decide what is better. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
