* Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-07 00:04]: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 02:12:03PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > debootstrap installs delo (the DECstation boot loader) on all mipsel > > systems, even though only DECstations need it. I seem to recall a > > discussion about removing all boot loaders from debootstrap since it's > > d-i's task to install them. What was the conclusion of this discussion? > > Whatever d-i needs is basically fine.
Well, I think it's kinda ugly to install delo on a mipsel sub-arch which doesn't need it at all because it has its own boot loader. How do people from other arch think about this? I intend to request removal from delo from debootstrap, but maybe we should do the same for other bootloaders. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
