Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:21:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2004 13:49:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 31 05:49:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.xs4all.be [195.144.64.135]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B8g63-0002er-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 05:49:36 -0800
Received: from vonk (195-144-092-031.dyn.adsl.xs4all.be [195.144.92.31])
by smtp1.xs4all.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VDnXPQ027062
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:49:33 +0200
Received: from fg by vonk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B8g5Y-0000aa-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:49:04 +0200
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:49:04 +0200
From: Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: d-i (20040315) failure on Compaq RAID
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-flash-is-evil: do not use it
X-virus: If this mail contains a virus, feel free to send one back
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.599, required 5,
AWL, BAYES_00)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official NetInst Snapshot
i386 Binary-1 (20040315)
Date: 20040315
Method: Boot and base system from CDROM
Machine: HP Proliant ML350 G3
Processor: P4 Xeon 2.8GHz
Memory: 2.5 GB
Root Device: Compaq raid /dev/cciss/disc0/part1
Root Size/partition table: 6GB
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [E]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
Installation of the kernel fails with:
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: constituent device /dev/cciss/disc0/part1 does not exist
Failed to create initrd image
/target/dev/cciss exists, and contains correct non-devfs device nodes (c0d0p1,...)
I guess devfs usage should be more consistent in the installer and the
target.
Frank
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 232413-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 02:21:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 19:21:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGTqh-0003N8-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:21:59 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dial236.pm3bloun2.bloun.naxs.com [216.98.69.236])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1C9861832D; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:21:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 84D5B6E25E; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:21:53 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
These bugs were fixed in previous uploads of libdebian-installer, and
the fixes are present in the daily builds. We'd appreciate any testing
you can do of the fixed installer.
--=20
see shy jo
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAhyxBd8HHehbQuO8RAip/AJ4+h8MDFWYXddsmk2EsrxyLeKC+bACg5bwz
Lvf0N6Vxz+pR6MZnWzt+hxQ=
=m2fG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
