On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:45:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 07:31:59PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 06:20:37PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 06:59:58PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > > But there still seem to be some problems: > > > > http://people.debian.org/~luther/debian-installer/daily-powerpc-built/2004.05.10/ > > > > > > > > contents are from yesterday (so the build is finished) but only contains a > > > > "powerpc" directory, no "power3", power4, powerpc-small and apus as > > > > http://people.debian.org/~luther/debian-installer/daily-powerpc-built/2004.05.10/ > > > > > > > > does ?! > > > > Damn, my autobuilder did break, second time since i have been away from > > home, but hopefully this will be solved quicker than last time. > > It should all be fixed already.
Well, yesterdays build did fail because of missing lvm2 or something such, altough i am a bit lost with the timezones (currently being in central america time), i suppose todays build should be ok then, let me check. > > > There seems to be a problem here: > > > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > > partman-lvm: Depends: lvmcfg-utils but it is not going to be installed > > > E: Broken packages > > > make[5]: *** [stamps/get_udebs-powerpc_monolithic-stamp] Error 100 > > > > Probably the lvmcfg-utils has not been yet built for powerpc or > > something such ? > > No, it just wasn't in the monolithic pkg-lists. There was then another > problem the next day due to a typo of "lvm2" instead of "lvm2-udeb". > Both are fixed now, but I've also made the default builds not build the > monolithic target since it's really only needed for developer testing. > Ok, cool, thanks for following on this. I should be fully operational next monday again, hopefully. Friendly, Sven LUther > Cheers, > > -- > Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
