On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:03:42PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On 10.V.2004 at 19:38 (+0100) Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > I personally would find it helpful to have d-i-<arch> pseudo packages, > > so install reports or other architecture specific bugs can be > > reassigned there. > > I'd also appreciate some solution. Though I think a better solution > is to create architecture tags for the bug reports. For example > > tags 238366 +mips > > I don't know how one can collect all bug reports marked with some > particular tag (for example "d-i"), but there must be some way to do > this.
You could just put the architecture name in the subject and stick '&include=powerpc' or whatever on the end of the URL. Bug tags have proven to be quite a bad model for extensible classes of things such as architectures (see the incredibly confusing potato, woody, sarge, sid, etc. tags); we need something different for those. I've had this conversation before with Martin so I'm sure he knows my viewpoint. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
