----- Forwarded message from Antonio Ingargiola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Antonio Ingargiola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:06:39 +0200 To: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#250626: installation report X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 2004-05-29, Joey Hess wrote: > Antonio Ingargiola wrote: > > well, I simply had some kernel that I was using with sid (with some > > customized boot parmameters). Installing grub, the generated menu.lst > > recognize the old kernel as they was for sarge too (they pointed to > > sarge's root partition). The sarge's own kernel (I chose the 2.6) boot > > correctly anyway, but I canot boot the sid. I loose also some tricky > > parms that I used with my own video card with sid. Maybe an example is > > more expicative than my bad english :-). > > > > with some cut > > > > old menu.lst: > > ------------- > > title My Sid (kernel 2.4.22-agp-fat) > > root (hd0,1) > > kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.22-agp-fat root=/dev/hda3 ro > > video=radeon:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > title Sid Experimental (kernel 2.6.4radeon) > > root (hd0,1) > > kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.4radeon root=/dev/hda3 ro video=radeon:[EMAIL > > PROTECTED] > > ------------- > > > > > > new menu.lst: > > ------------- > > title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.4.22-agp-fat <- WRONG > > root (hd0,1) > > kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.22-agp-fat root=/dev/hda9 ro > > savedefault > > boot > > I don't understand why it changed the root to /dev/hda9 here. That seems > to be the (er) root of your problem with the old entries failing to > boot. Can you send me your /var/log/debian-installer/syslog please? Excuse me for the delay. Yes, it is the /root of my old kernel that is bad-recognized, but also I had some kernel's boot parametre that I loose (video=radeon:1024x768). Here is my /var/log/debian-installer/syslog Ciao, -Antonio ----- End forwarded message ----- -- see shy jo
syslog.gz
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
