Your message dated Mon, 07 Jun 2004 16:31:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#253101: Should check for /sbin/dhclient3, not /var/lib/dhcp3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2004 08:52:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 07 01:52:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BXFrq-0000hK-00; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 01:52:30 -0700
Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=localhost)
by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
id 1BXFrp-000Pn4-00; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 08:52:29 +0000
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 5621610D6EE; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:52:29 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Should check for /sbin/dhclient3, not /var/lib/dhcp3
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:52:29 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: netcfg
Version: 0.67
Severity: minor
In dhcp.c it would be better to do:
if (access("/sbin/dhclient3", F_OK) == 0)
dhcp_client = DHCLIENT3;
than to do (as currently):
if (access("/var/lib/dhcp3", F_OK) == 0)
at line 79. Checking for the daemon executable is more or less
standard practice and it is what the code does for /sbin/dhclient
and for /sbin/pump.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 253101-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2004 14:31:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 07 07:31:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from post-20.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.1]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BXL9m-0002EX-00; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:31:22 -0700
Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=localhost)
by post-20.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
id 1BXL9l-0008Ap-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 14:31:21 +0000
Received: from localhost.demon.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCE510E13A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:31:20 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Bug#253101: Should check for /sbin/dhclient3, not
/var/lib/dhcp3
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 16:31:20 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 16:26, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> I don't want to rock the boat anymore though.
OK, I see why you checked /var/lib/dhcp3 instead of /sbin/dhclient3.
This also explains why killall.sh doesn't look for an executable named
'dhclient3'. Sorry for the confusion.
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
