Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > (This isn't related with Bug#228839. So we need to split again if we > apply this patch.)
Hmm, I'm not sure this isn't related to 228839. While worded differently, the idea is the same-->the debconf priority after 2nd stage should be the same then the original priority, whatever it is. I mentioned this as "should re-ask the debconf priority question after base-config" because at this time, I saw the problem this way. But, indeed, we should, at the very beginning of 1st stage, keep the debconf/cdebconf priority and just reset it at the end of the 2nd stage (that is, base-config). This was the "philosophy" of 228839, at the least.....and as far as I have understood, your concern is similar. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
