On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:14:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> The reason why the new busybox didn't get into testing was that it also
> required a new netcfg, and between those two the changes were very
> invasive for tc1.
In other words, a version that is known to be unusable is a better
test candidate than one that may be broken. :-(
The busybox-cvs-udeb version with the fix is in sarge for i386.
Can it be put there for sparc now?
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
