On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 01:45:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.25.1808 +0200]: > > On the other hand, if I'm installing a system with d-i, I probably > > don't want to use lvm. I prefer to keep my systems simple and > > I don't need the complication of lvm on them. This is a personal > > preference, and maybe I shouldn't be using the autopartitioner. > > But if lvm support is added, we need to at least consider giving > > users the option of profiles that don't use it. > > Yes, certainly. In expert mode. But, provided that LVM has reached > a stable point (which it seems to have), the average user will > likely profit from LVM in that a second harddisk can be easily > inserted into the system. Much better than additional mount points > and the like...
Just beware that we don't have working d-i LVM on all architectures yet. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
