Well, I'm very sure (90% sure) that it was TC1. I know beta4 is up there now and I remember seeing a TC1 images then a note saying "if TC1 doesn't work, try beta4" and beta4 images were right below. But yes, I understand what you're saying.
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:59:51 -0700, Karl Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 16:21 -0400, Nathan Widmyer wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:23:46 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Nathan Widmyer wrote: > > > > I'm trying to install Debian sarge on a hard drive in a USB enclosure. > > > > I got the 110MB sarge image. > > > > > > Which version? > > > > > > > The date on the file is June 22nd, so thats either the date from the > > original file on debians' server or the date I finished downloading > > the image. If there a way to tell definitely because opening the > > readme, it only says "Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official > > NetInst Snapshot i386 Binary-1 CD" > > You should rename the iso right after you download it to something like > "sarge-i386-netinst-2004.06.28.iso" so that the iso-8601 date is encoded > in the file name. They cannot rename it on the server, or the "current" > link will break. > > -- > Karl Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
