Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:14:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2004 08:30:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 21 00:30:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sunny.navmonkey.net [66.98.142.96]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AuSWv-00019A-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:30:33 -0800
Received: from cpanel by sunny.navmonkey.net with local (Exim 4.24)
id 1AuSWM-0000hV-6V
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:29:58 +0000
Received: from 69.51.135.181 ([69.51.135.181])
by joweelee.com (IMP) with HTTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@localhost>; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:29:58 +0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:29:58 +0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package: installation-reports
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1
X-Originating-IP: 69.51.135.181
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse
report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sunny.navmonkey.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32001 502] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - joweelee.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Debian-Installer beta 2 released, Debian.org
uname -a: <The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt>
Date: Feb 21 2004,3:20 AM
Method: Boot from cds by configuring the bios
Machine: Desktop
Processor: Pentium 4 1.6
Memory: 512 MB DDR-RAM
Root Device: IDE IBM hdd and Western Digital hdd
Root Size/partition table: <Feel free to paste the full partition
table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.>
Output of lspci:
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [o]
Configure network HW: [o]
Config network: [o]
Detect CD: [o]
Load installer modules: [e]
Detect hard drives: [o]
Partition hard drives: [o]
Create file systems: [o]
Mount partitions: [o]
Install base system: [o]
Install boot loader: [o]
Reboot: [o]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
The load installer modules could not detect my IDE drive, but it still works
for installation. And one thing that i am concerning was this debian installer
should have the dual boot option of LILO ( like previous woody ). For example,
we able to boot from all the drive that we had partition. Because after i
installed the debian using the debian installer, the boot option straight boot
to linux, and i lost my windows MBR. Even i tried to re-configure the LILO and
using grub it doesn't work. And for the boot option i would suggest it support
vanilla as well,since my LCD display could properly display the wording during
installation.Thanks.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 234000-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 19:54:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 05 12:54:00 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BhZXL-0007eV-00; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 12:54:00 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-91-133.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.133])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5E718D71
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 19:49:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 041A86EE69; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:14:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:14:18 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Closing this report, issues have been cloned and the remaining ones
should no longer be present in current images.
--=20
see shy jo
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA6Zp6d8HHehbQuO8RAgmeAKDE9nlGWLJrq9X/ARMHFhVyCEO10ACgtiPZ
t3ttykU2Jd9KEfhX7uuznFE=
=ldSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
