Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:58:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2004 22:46:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 12 14:46:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (server.activmedia.com) [207.218.42.114]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ArPbH-0007Ou-00; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:46:27 -0800
Received: by server.activmedia.com (Postfix, from userid 540)
id 4A9E217BA1; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:45:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by server.activmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495B717A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:45:56 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:45:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Matt Vestal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: beta2 installation test
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=DATING,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta 2
uname -a: tried testing
Date: 2-12-04 2:00pm EST
Method: Downloaded boot floppies because the CDROM wouldn't boot. Gets to
ISO-LINUX.....
Machine: Versalogic VSBC-8
Processor: PIII 850MHz
Memory: 256MB
Root Device: IDE, TravelStar 20GB 2.5" drive
Root Size/partition table:
/boot 64MB
/ 2GB
swap 256MB
/var 500MB
/tmp 500MB
/home 2.5GB
/usr ~4.5GB
Output of lspci:
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [E]
Reboot: [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
At the screen to install LILO I hit return using the default hard drive.
It went to a black screen, displayed a few messages about failing to load
certain module, like usb-serial, then went right back to the LILO screen.
Hitting return and choosing 'continue' both resulted in this behavior. I
then tried to leave the field blank and hit return and got the same thing.
I thought I was dead in the water, so I hit a few garbage characters, hit
return, and got back to the menu of installation options.
I then installed GRUB, which seems to have worked, though the GRUB
installer progress-bar didn't get cleared and now I'm back at the
installer main menu.
I then chose to finish the installation, and then main menu disappeared,
displaying the GRUB progress-bar, which was at 80% and said "updating
/etc/kernel-img.conf". It never did anything, so I hit the reset button.
No kernel ever gets installed, so the boot fails.
I tried this 3 or 4 times with different servers and had same results.
<Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
and ideas you had during the initial install.>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 232462-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 19:53:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 05 12:53:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BhZXL-0007dK-00; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 12:53:59 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-91-133.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.133])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745B018D6A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 19:49:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 10DE76EE5B; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:58:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:58:20 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No response from submitter.
--=20
see shy jo
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA6Za8d8HHehbQuO8RAilNAJ9VvM8qtxiqbk9p07zZz1AYqCfq1ACgoMN8
rw7mLT1O8x4JTFnSjvjj0Qw=
=ZJ7n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
