Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > LANGUAGE in languagechooser contains the 4th field of languagelist > > (see languagemap script). This field *always* has the two-letter code > > of the language. > > Except for zh_CN, zh_TW, and pt_BR, surely?
No, even for those, the 4th field is the iso-639 language code. Anyway, in the case we're currently dealing with, no matter whether this is zh_CN or zh_TW, no goal is loading things specific to languages display. However, of course, the *locales* for these languages are different, definitely. This language code, per se, is not kept anywhere after languagechooser. The important thing becomes the locale. So, definitely, the test we're talking about, has redundant entries. Be, I currently prefer being conservative. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
