[Per Olofsson] > Isn't policy-rc.d a cleaner solution? AFAIK nothing in policy requires > a package to use start-stop-daemon, but it does say that maintainer > scripts [1]should use invoke-rc.d.
Perhaps. But at the moment, start-stop-daemon has the largest chance of working. > Maybe > both techniques should be used since invoke-rc.d is not a strict > requirement yet. I guess we could do both, and remove the dummy start-stop-daemon when everything is using invoke-rc.d. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
