"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [I'm only Cc-ing 265597 to tell people to stop Cc-ing the wrong bug now :-P] > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 07:25:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >>> Linux,parisc* ) ARCH=LINUXHPPA ;; >>> Linux,arm* ) ARCH=LINUXARM ;; >>> Linux,x86_64* ) ARCH=LINUXAMD64 ;; >>> Linux,* ) ARCH=LINUX`uname -m | tr [a-z] [A-Z]` ;; >>> [...] >> The tests for amd64 is wrong. You are testing for the presence of an >> amd64 cpu which doesn't mean that a 64bit amd64 linux is running. You >> MUST override $ht from the rules file with the DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU or >> you get FTBFS errors on i386 on amd64 cpus. > > What do you mean by "$ht"? I might be stupid now, but I really can't find any > such variable in debian/rules.
The $ht used in the case statement. I have no clue how to do that but its neccessay. On i386 I get: % uname -m x86_64 > Anyhow, this is Not A Bug(TM) for sarge. Yes it is. A kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 is in the works for i386. Since you need to upload a new version anyway check how to force the ARCH to the right thing. >> bash$ touch m R; uname -m | tr [a-z] [A-Z] >> R68k >> >> Please add '' > > :-) > > I'll fix that right away for sarge. > > /* Steinar */ > -- > Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
