Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:55:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#271275: netcfg: Go back button doesn't work properly if no link
is detected
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2004 09:41:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 12 02:41:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-203-113-235-240.act.netspace.net.au (caesar.andrew.net.au)
[203.113.235.240]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C6Qr1-0002eu-00; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:41:03 -0700
Received: from caesar.andrew.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by caesar.andrew.net.au (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id
i8C9esX8032405;
Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:40:54 +1000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by caesar.andrew.net.au (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i8C9erW1032403;
Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:40:53 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netcfg: Go back button doesn't work properly if no link is detected
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:40:53 +1000
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.01
Severity: normal
Hi,
I was verifying #262638 tonight, and just had the USB Ethernet adapter
plugged in, without a cable plugged into it.
I got the screen that says there's no link detected, and do I want to go
back, or do some other stuff. If I go back, I get asked for a hostname,
if I go back on that screen, I get back at the screen saying that no
link is detected.
regards
Andrew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 271275-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2004 09:55:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 12 02:55:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.84]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C6R4a-00043O-00; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:55:04 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.194.252 with
login)
by smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Sep 2004 09:55:04 -0000
Received: by triplehelix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BBE462A9542; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:55:03 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#271275: netcfg: Go back button doesn't work properly if no link is
detected
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joshua Kwan)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 07:40:53PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Version: 1.01
fixed in version 1.02 since yesterday
--
Joshua Kwan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
