Your message dated Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:41:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#276708: Debian-installer: S/390 wrongly attempts to install s390x 
kernel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2004 19:22:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 15 12:22:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ka.graffl.net [193.154.165.8] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CIXfG-0007gQ-00; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:22:58 -0700
Received: from services.fsf.net (adsl-66-136-169-57.dsl.stlsmo.swbell.net 
[66.136.169.57])
        by ka.graffl.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id i9FJJXr4025265
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 21:19:34 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=amavis)
        by services.fsf.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CIXby-0003gs-Ny; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:19:34 -0500
Received: from services.fsf.net ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (services.fsf.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 13985-04; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:19:29 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from adam by services.fsf.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CIXbs-0003gn-UH; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:19:29 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Debian-installer: S/390 wrongly attempts to install s390x kernel
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:19:28 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Adam Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at fsf.net
X-ka.graffl.net-MailScanner: I won't say that there's no virus in it.
X-ka.graffl.net-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (timed out)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: Debian-installer
Version: RC1 card decks, whatever's on ftp.debian.org on 20041015
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

If you try to install, using the Debian-installer RC1 boot card decks,
from ftp.us.debian.org (on 15 Oct 2004), d-i tries to install the s390x
kernel.  Since this is on an s390 system (31-bit) rather than an s390x
system (64-bit), installation fails pretty gruesomely.  This means that
no one on an S/390 system can install.  That's bad.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 276708-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2004 21:41:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 15 14:41:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CIZpj-00055w-00; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:41:55 -0700
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 810803C041; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:41:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:41:51 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Adam Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#276708: Debian-installer: S/390 wrongly attempts to install s390x 
kernel
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 04:14:04PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I suspect that it doesn't help matters that the code in base-installer's
> postinst, in the get_arch_kernel function for s390 tries to use a
> kernel-image-$(uname -r). Since there is no such kernel image (it's
> missing "-1-s390" at the end), this makes it more likely to fall back to
> random selection.

No, that code is correct. The suffix is part of the kernel version.
| $ uname -r =20
| 2.4.27-1-s390=20
And kernel-image-2.4.27-1-s390 exists.

Bastian

--=20
Bones: "The man's DEAD, Jim!"

--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkFwRB8ACgkQnw66O/MvCNGQxwCfVBvbGoQLnimI7dJWvdrLEb1J
IisAnA9qVVEBOH6nmU0MlvwxvCkE8e8C
=l87C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to