On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 03:52:48PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > This is needed because there's no LVM flag set on a MD device, and > probably no way to set it, as I understand it. I agree we seem to need > this although the special case is disttasteful. Another option would be > to not check for the valid flag at all. Since some architectures > (powerpc) don't include lvm in the valid flags at all, that would > perhaps support lvm on such arches. Yet another approach might be to fix > parted to include the flag..
I think it doesn't matter what way you will choose because after sarge I intend to integrate partman-lvm better with partman. Now partman-lvm is simply a wrapper around lvmcfg and lvmcfg was designed for use with partconf, not partman. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
