On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:10:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:35:45PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Is there a good reason why all the d-i kernel udebs are still at > > > 2.6.21 rather than 2.6.22? If not, I'd like to update mips* and arm. > > > I personally prefer to discuss it tomorrow at the meeting. So we can > > decide it and try to move all arches together. > > What is there to discuss? 2.6.22 is targetted for testing in the tear > future, is there some reason I'm missing why we wouldn't want to migrate d-i > to 2.6.22 ASAP?
We need to discuss how (= who/when) we are going to do it.
That's all. :)
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio .''`.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
