On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:30:45AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> | Unresolvable symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <screenshot about="more on vfprintf">
> $ grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] build_netboot.log | sort -u | grep need
> needed_symbols adding [EMAIL PROTECTED], weak: False
> needed_symbols adding [EMAIL PROTECTED], weak: False
> Still need: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Still need: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> </screenshot>
>
> How can I check
> if the file that provides [EMAIL PROTECTED] is present on the build system?
objdump -T /lib/libc.so.6
> To rule out that symbol versioning in mklibs is fixed.
| # mklibs-readelf --print-symbols-provided /lib/libc.so.6 | grep vfprintf
| __nldbl_vfprintf False GLIBC_2.4 True
| _IO_vfprintf False GLIBC_2.4 True
| _IO_vfprintf False GLIBC_2.0 False
| __nldbl__IO_vfprintf False GLIBC_2.4 True
| __vfprintf_chk False GLIBC_2.4 True
| __vfprintf_chk False GLIBC_2.3.4 False
| __nldbl___vfprintf_chk False GLIBC_2.4 True
| vfprintf False GLIBC_2.0 False
| vfprintf False GLIBC_2.4 True
In my test it finds it on sparc.
> Something else
> | Still need: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What about those [EMAIL PROTECTED] symbols?
"No version".
Bastian
--
War isn't a good life, but it's life.
-- Kirk, "A Private Little War", stardate 4211.8
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
