Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-10 17:58]: > > It does makes sense that a larger buffer size than the default 512 > > bytes (not 1 byte AFAIK) would speed it up somewhat, by saving syscall > > overhead. > > > > If there's a common divisor, like a block size, and it's reasonably big > > (a few K), it'd make sense to use that. > > Uh, that sounds pretty complicated. Is it worth the hassle? How much > RAM is it using at the moment anyway?
I assume it's using up to the size of the initramfs, so about 3.5 mb. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
