Hi Frans, On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 07:58:18PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > win32-loader was included in the repository in packages/arch/i386, but IMO > that is not correct. Reason I feel it is not correct is that, although it > is definitely related to D-I, it is not a D-I component (does not produce > udebs). > > I thought that the location was chosen so that translating it could be > integrated, and I thought that was already the case. Yesterday I learned > that this is not so.
I expected that translation would be integrated eventually. Christian mentioned there are technical problems with that. I'm willing to help on those if I can, but we haven't got around to discussing it yet (it wasn't a big priority for me either). > I also personally feel that translation of win32-loader should not be > integrated in the level 1 infrastructure _because_ it isn't a D-I > component. You mean that because win32-loader doesn't produce udebs, it can't be considered a D-I component, and therefore its translations can't be integrated? Is this based on the assumption that only udebs provide programs that interact with the user during the install process? -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
