Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> I'm personally not in favor of moving tasksel to D-I.
>> D-I SVN is not "all your source are belong to us"...
>
>
> Well, I volunterily launched this, about tasksel because I feel like
> the package is, in reality, maintained by the D-I team since about
> 2004.
>
> Joey is definitely the one who bringed the most to it (working on it
> with big "hops") so I think he should have the last work on this.
>
> Pros: l10n, definitely. Translators are the same ones and the only
> ones who aren't allowed to tasksel but are for d-i are those I
> forgot to add
>
> Cons: Frans argument is valid, certainly. We don't want to give this
> feeling and if someone wants to step deeper into tasksel, we don't
> want to prevent him|her to do so.
I'm with you and think that it should be moved to d-i repository. I
don't agree with Frans argument that aptitude and apt fits in same
cathegory since it's not maintained by d-i team.
tasksel is so "d-i team maintained" that its commit messages shows up
on #debian-boot so makes sense to keep it in same svn repository.
This is up to Joey to ack or nack this move from my POV.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
