On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:53:21 -0400 Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:13:02 -0400 > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > > What do you think about #467324 ? Do you think it will make sense > > > to include Gnash in the Desktop task? > > > > > > > On the other side, as not all the Flash contents are fully working > > > (Youtube is working properly, anyway, which is one of the most > > > demanded Flash contents), it can be argued if end users might > > > reject > > Is that supposed to say isn't working properly? I just tested gnash > on youtube (because it is so commonly requested; it's not of particlar I just discover why youtube didn't work with gnash; It seems gnash is ignoring the http proxy from gnome and the proxy in mozilla. It might actually be fine otherwise. UI love. -- And that's my crabbing done for the day. Got it out of the way early, now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or strangle cute bunnies or something. -- Michael Devore GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C http://gnupg.org No more sea shells: Daniel's Weblog http://cshore.wordpress.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
