Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Frans Pop wrote: > > IMO a difference of 4 MB is not really worth the testing effort, nor does > > it > > make any real difference to users. So I propose to just get rid of the > > distinction between lowmem level 1 and 2. > > The only reason I can see to keep it is that the levels might change in > the future. If level 1 drops below 32 mb, there will be a good reason to > want it. Or if level 2 raises above 48 mb, we'll want level 1 again. > > Both of these seem unlikely at the moment, but it's hard to tell..
Can't we keep all dual-level mechanisms in place but just use the same limit for both levels at this moment? That would preserve the existing work...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
