On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 03:13:23PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Daniel Pocock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > b) The domU systems should be indistinguishable from normal systems - > > using D-I is one way to ensure this. It seems reasonable to expect > > that any changes to the install process will happen in D-I before > > being implemented elsewhere (e.g. is it possible that xen-create-image > > may lag behind D-I on some things?) > > Both D-I and xen-create-image call debootstrap. There should be little > difference. Most of the install process is implemented in the actual > debs and those will be the same all the time.
Are you sure about that? Last time I played with debootstrap, I noticed that d-i does _lots_ of configuration (e.g. localization, autodetect, etc) that is simply not done by debootstrap. This is why I am still with d-i ;-) BTW: does xen-create-image also use udebs as d-i does? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]