On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Joel Baker wrote:
> I'd believe it. Another reason to use 3.0 as the default, if I can make it
> work. Sadly, NetBSD still uses egcs 2.91 as it's default compiler, so I have
> no idea if we might need 2.95 as a kernel compiler. Hopefully we can get
> the kernel patched to be clean for 3.0, if it's not. I guess we'll see.
NetBSD-current uses 2.95.3, and I've seen a chunk of commits go
by on the NetBSD lists regarding fixing extra warnings detected
by gcc 3.0, so you may find it easier than you expect :)
--
David/absolute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
