On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 11:05:51PM +0000, David Brownlee wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Joel Baker wrote: > > > I'd believe it. Another reason to use 3.0 as the default, if I can make it > > work. Sadly, NetBSD still uses egcs 2.91 as it's default compiler, so I have > > no idea if we might need 2.95 as a kernel compiler. Hopefully we can get > > the kernel patched to be clean for 3.0, if it's not. I guess we'll see. > > NetBSD-current uses 2.95.3, and I've seen a chunk of commits go > by on the NetBSD lists regarding fixing extra warnings detected > by gcc 3.0, so you may find it easier than you expect :)
Fair enough; I'm working from a base of 1.5.2, with the only -current stuff being taken from /usr/pkgsrc. Current status on 3.0: 3.0.4ds1 (the package version) breaks. I'm trying to use CVS HEAD, but the patches are being a royal pain in the rear to massage into applying. We'll see what I can get out of it at the end. -- *************************************************************************** Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.lightbearer.com/lucifer/
