On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:54:29PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > > Two main things: > > > > 1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? If > > so, I might futz with trying to do up a chroot based on that, at some point > > here... unless someone else desperately wants to do it or something. > > Kind of. I had problems building it. Ironically, I have -STABLE patched > to build with the Debian gcc. (3.0.4) Except the kernel, which I use the > FreeBSD compiler for. :(
Interesting. It was largely the kernel I was hoping was GCC 3.x compliant. Guess it isn't yet. Hrrrf. > If you're really interested in this, I can let you have my packaging > scripts. That could be useful; or I could put them up (with permission) on the archive... > > 2) pmake (aka /usr/src/usr.bin/make) - the source tree for this on the > > various BSD flavors differ significantly, but all appear to share some > > basic level of functionality. How similar are they? I'm looking at taking > > over the pmake package, and wondering whether stealing just one would > > suffice, or whether I need to do pmake-netbsd, pmake-freebsd, pmake-openbsd > > (heck, maybe pmake-bsd44 for the origional BSD 4.4 version?) and allow > > folks to use /etc/alternatives to select what 'pmake' actually calls. > > I needed a lot of other tools to build FreeBSD, especially the kernel, > so I just included BSD make into that. Debian's pmake package won't > build for me. Bug filed? Reference? I can probably arrange to ensure this, at least, gets fixed in the relatively near future, if so. -- *************************************************************************** Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.lightbearer.com/lucifer/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
