On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:48:23PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote: > > That last sentence doesn't make sense, Robert. If you do get NPTL > running on NetBSD, you'll have to use the same NetBSD kernel interfaces > as the native libc does.
I know, but we do the same for the rest of kernel interfaces already. > In any case, it's obviously far saner to try to port libpthreads from > the NetBSD libc to glibc than to port NPTL from Linux. That makes sense. We already borrow code from NetBSD libc for the Glibc port. -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
