On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:55:39PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:56:30PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > It's about the GNU libc and userland, which are the standard in Debian and > > I see no reason to replace them. > > For the record, probably 70% of the email that I've seen on this list > falls somewhere under the category of a single, perpetual, floating > discussion/argument/flamewar. > > To wit: > > NetBSD/FreeBSD/OpenBSD? > > GNU libc or native libc? (I've never seen another alternative, IIRC) > > GNU userland or native userland?
I agree with you. This discussion is just the nth iteration of the same waste of time. I'll go back to hacking now.. -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
