severity 559645 grave thanks On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 02:22:05AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Aurelien's segfault fix [1] seemed quite obvious, so I submitted it > > to BTS, bug #559645 (btw, is severity appropiate? I don't know if > > GNU/kFreeBSD bugs are considered RC these days...). > > When something is clearly broken and preventing important parts of the > system to work, I think it deserves serious severity. > > (From an FTBFS point of view, RC if already built once, since it > prevents migration to testing, important otherwise, as for other > architectures. For other bugs, I'm not sure there's a strict policy.)
I'm tentatively raising the severity to RC. If the maintainer disagrees, well, he can set it back so no harm done. > #559645 is missing “Usertags: kfreebsd” by the way. Thanks, I noticed a while ago and I believe it's already fixed. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
