On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:59:03AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Aurelien's segfault fix [1] seemed quite obvious, so I submitted it to > > BTS, bug #559645 (btw, is severity appropiate? I don't know if GNU/kFreeBSD > > bugs are considered RC these days...). > > Does it really segfault on your machine? It shouldn't as it uses > snprintf. In my case, the displayed name was just broken. > > If it doesn't segfault on your machine, I think it deserves a severity > "minor".
Ok, I readjusted it. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
