El 1 d’abril de 2012 17:14, Steven Chamberlain <[email protected]> ha escrit: >> root@nana:/run# df . >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on >> tmpfs 52 52 0 100% /run > > /run was using a *tiny* tmpfs. Only small/empty files should be written > there, but each will consume a few kb anyway. I would think 512k-1024k > would be safer.
tmpfs implementation in FreeBSD is very problematic. When I asked in freebsd-fs about this last year, it spawned a long discussion, may be worth reading: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2011-October/012592.html I wonder if we should avoid tmpfs entirely for the time being. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxnjkyndyad3_nofbg0b_btqhxc3flkks1xoj1nh+tl...@mail.gmail.com
