Hello, This page [0] states that accept4, SOCK_CLOEXEC and SOCK_NONBLOCK are implemented only in FreeBSD 10, but libc on gnu/kfreebsd has prototype for accept4.
It seems to me that even if debian's kfreebsd supports accept4 (I doubt) it will be better to remove that prototype because: 1) it's useless without SOCK_CLOEXEC or SOCK_NONBLOCK 2) some software assumes that accept4 and SOCK_CLOEXEC go together so they check only for accept4 but not for SOCK_CLOEXEC, it's the reason why ruby2.0 build is failed on kfreebsd. [0]: https://wiki.freebsd.org/AtomicCloseOnExec -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAAB-Kck5NfzLNpg3eL=-jckuvejpfi1zlnkn8awcqv4hv48...@mail.gmail.com
