Hi, Hleb Valoshka: > Hello, > > This page [0] states that accept4, SOCK_CLOEXEC and SOCK_NONBLOCK are > implemented only in FreeBSD 10, but libc on gnu/kfreebsd has prototype > for accept4. > > It seems to me that even if debian's kfreebsd supports accept4 (I > doubt) it will be better to remove that prototype because: > 1) it's useless without SOCK_CLOEXEC or SOCK_NONBLOCK > 2) some software assumes that accept4 and SOCK_CLOEXEC go together so > they check only for accept4 but not for SOCK_CLOEXEC, it's the reason > why ruby2.0 build is failed on kfreebsd.
I agree with what you say, but since <sys/socket.h> is a kernel-independant header, it is up to the glibc maintainers to do this. Please can you file a bug on libc0.1-dev so that your request is considered? I would suggest wrapping it, e.g.: #if defined(SOCK_CLOEXEC) || defined(SOCK_NONBLOCK) /* accept4 prototype */ #endif -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
